St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital ยท Spring Hill, Brisbane For referrers 07 3063 5500
Menu

Conference Presentation ·11 April 2025

Glenoid component position at the APOA Conference in Cairns

Rohit Sane presenting at the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association Conference in Cairns
Rohit Sane presenting at the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association Conference in Cairns

A fellow presenting at the APOA Conference

Congratulations to Rohit Sane, a fellow from Mumbai, who presented research at the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association Conference in Cairns.

Rohit Sane presenting at the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association Conference in Cairns

What the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association is

The Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association, or APOA, is the regional federation of national orthopaedic associations across the Asia Pacific, Australia among them. It runs a conference at which surgeons and trainees from member countries present their research, and it supports subspecialty sections and travelling fellowships across the region. For a fellow, presenting there means having an abstract reviewed and accepted on its merits, and then answering questions from an audience working in very different health systems.

The study

The study, "Quantifying the Difference in Glenoid Component Position", compares where the glenoid component is placed in total shoulder arthroplasty against reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

The glenoid is the socket of the shoulder, a shallow dish on the outer edge of the shoulder blade, and the glenoid component is the implant fixed to that surface during a shoulder replacement. In an anatomic total shoulder replacement it forms a new socket for a ball on the arm bone. In a reverse replacement the arrangement is swapped over, and the component fixed to the glenoid carries the ball instead.

It reports that the ideal position for a reverse shoulder implant sits lower, or more inferiorly, than for a total shoulder implant. The difference between the two is larger in bigger glenoids, while increasing the size of the implant itself has little effect on it. Individual results vary.

Why this is useful

The two operations are often discussed as variations on the same procedure, but they are planned differently, and this quantifies one of the ways in which that is true. For a surgeon planning either operation, knowing that the target position differs systematically, and that the difference scales with the size of the socket rather than with the implant, is directly applicable at the planning stage.

Related information